I feel like my essay is quite weak at this point. I do not have enough support from the essay to prove my point. Also my side on the article remaining in the text is not as well defined as it should be. I think it should remain in the book but I do not believe that I elaborated on this thought enough.

My essay does  have strong connecting thoughts as to what Hekker is talking about. I think I have understood what Hekkers view is and I feel like I can relate that to my audience very well.