7 thoughts on “

  1. rdeanr
    5:29 pm - 7-28-2011

    What do you think the importance of having a house is to these girls? What does it signify, and how does that perhaps connect to larger feminist concerns? (Nice use of Anzaldua and Cisneros here!)

  2. Carly Toepfer
    12:25 am - 7-29-2011

    Well, one reason having a house could be important is because it is one of the main parts of the “American Dream,” which is one of the cultures that Anzaldua talks about having to straddle with.

  3. Julia
    10:21 am - 7-29-2011

    @rdeanr,

    At initial reading of The House on Mango Street, I believe most would sympathize with Esperanza for her desire to have a “nice” home and a stable life. This emphasis for stability whether emotional or financial is so stressed in American culture. Our American culture has continued to place more and more emphasis on our “worth” as a person by means of commercial goods or who has the most and the nicest things. Anyone not reflecting these ideals is not considered as valuable. The fact that Esperanza is poor and her house is not the dream house “with trees around it, a great big yard and grass growing without a fence” is a reflection of how she is not of real worth according to societies’ standards.

    This leads me into my next point about the connection between the American Dream as Carly metioned below and the connection shared to one the major concerns many feminists share.

  4. Julia
    10:28 am - 7-29-2011

    @ Carly,

    I definitely agree with your initial analysis young girl’s idealization of the “American Dream.” It is through this glamorized ideal that we have sold so many young girls and women into believing that true happiness comes ONLY when you are a wife, mother, and have that picket fence surrounding your beautiful home. This idea leaves women, including myself, with the belief that without attaining this dream you will never reach real happiness or your full potential.

    It is a hard cycle and system of beliefs to break free from as Anzaldua and even Sandra Cisnero’s character Esperanza have shown. Despite this denial of what seems so natural a desire within us, true happiness can only be attained when we realize that this “American Dream” or this desire for wholeness and happiness can not be bought or even given to us by another but that it is, in fact, found within us and is made up of all the things that encompass who we are.

  5. kdboyd
    8:31 pm - 7-29-2011

    Bravo on the blog! I think you did an excellent job of examining sections of The House on Mango Street. I can agree when you said this book “is a perfect example of the intersectionality that is prominent in so many of our lives as women and especially for women other than the color “White.”Being a woman of color I can relate to this novel a lot more than any other article or book we have read. In the urban community there is a sense of pride of accomplishments for every positive thing. I believe the quote home is where the heart is can relate so much to this novel. The main character was able to still establish a better lifestyle. But what I appreciated most is her love for her family and neighborhood. Even though she perceived to have the perfect lifestyle it was nothing without her family. Sometimes people forget about the true meaning of family values until it’s too late. Overall, I just thought this was an interesting book.

  6. Cassy Collier
    9:49 pm - 7-29-2011

    I really like the points that you made about the book. In particular, the observations in the end stuck with me. Esperanza is the personification of la mestizo, yes. And she is conflicted, at times in denial of the whole aspect of her being. What I interpreted your conclusion and quote selection as that Esperanza is the trap la mestiza could fall into, at times self-loathing, always feeling a disconnect with a whole self-consciousness, cognitive dissonance you mention, yes?

    I think though, that such a journey, merging these borderland identities into a single entity does come with conflict. But I don’t think that cognitive dissonance is the end being for Esperanza or the pioneers of la mestiza. At the end, I felt Esperanza had begun the path of self-acceptance, recognizing her community, people, and her place in it. I guess my question is do you think Esperanza’s journey we see is a good glimpse into a chance of resolving this cognitive dissonance that la mestiza’s could face? I feel as if there is an acceptance at the end, but I’m interested in your take. =]

  7. juliau
    8:58 am - 7-30-2011

    @Cassy,

    I appreciate your thoughts back on the blog! Perhaps where I was trying to go with the above was more of an unfinished thought. For me, during this chapter especially I felt like this was a prominent example of issues many mestizas may feel. This insecurity and at times rejection of themselves and all the things such as “home” that encompass who they are.

    I do believe at the end of HOMS Esperanza finds resolution and begins to more clearly define who she is. She may not be completely resolved or without some “dissonance” remaining as I feel this is common for all of us but it comes as a part of that struggle to move along this journey or perhaps as you put it “merging these borderland identities into a single entity,”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *