Out of the 3 modules, I liked the DNA module the best.  I enjoyed the fluidity and the various modalities they offered to present the information, such as including video, bio, and easy to follow animations.  I thought the animations were a great way to visually share the information.   The animations were my favorite and kept my attention.  It was visually appealing to my senses and easy to follow/navigate.  The “Framework for Evaluating” reading suggests:

“Presentation design Design of visual and auditory information for enhanced learning and efficient mental
processing
Interaction usability Ease of navigation, predictability of the user interface, and the quality of the interface
help features”

I felt the DNA module easily shared those attributes.  In addition, the site was understandable.  The material was clear, concise and provided continuity as you transitioned through the process.  Goals and objectives salient and provided direction.  The module was also visually appealing to watch.

The MecMovies module I thought had positive attributes of content quality, clearly stating learning objectives, and  interaction usability.  However, I found it to be difficult to navigate and understand.  Partly b/c I do not know anything about Mechanics of Materials, but also b/c it is not clearly identified what Mechanics of Materials is or means…   Someone knew such as I visiting the module would be lost w/ out knowing what are we looking at….what does it mean…how/why is it useful to us to know.

The Neuroscience for kids module had great graphics.  I felt the step by step pictures were a great way of grabbing that aesthetic appeal.  I did feel however, as the “Points to Remember…” reading indicate, that the module was very much lacking media integration.  I would have liked to of seen at least some of the topics portrayed in an animation and/or video.  The brain development topic for example, I thought would have been a great animation.

After exploring the modules and readings I feel these criteria/attributes are most important to consider when evaluating interactive multimedia educational/training modules:

• Ease of use and navigation~  if I can not find my way around the module, or understand how to it, I will likely abandon it and look for another
• Content quality~ the module should have appropriate explanation and detail of what is being presented, goals, etc.
• Layout~  does the layout facilitate learning?  Navigational cues/icons are consistent, there is continuity and fluidity
• Aesthetics~ the module is visually appealing and reaching sensory levels as to connect w/ the learner to help provide a more effective learning environment
• Motivation~ ability to interest the learner
• Media integration~ the module combines various multimedia modalities to provide an effective whole
• Overall functionality~ the learning is going away from it having learned something!