Archive for the 'Quality Matters' Category

Oct 29 2009


BGSU Selected to Host Center of Excellence for E-learning

image

BOWLING GREEN, O.—Bowling Green State University’s investment in e-learning over the past decade has paid dividends for hundreds of northwest Ohio students seeking to finish their bachelor’s and master’s degree programs online.

Now, the experience and expertise that built an inventory of over 500 online courses and 15 online degree and certificate programs has been recognized by the Ohio Board of Regents (OBOR) and its Ohio Learning Network (OLN).

BGSU has been selected as the site for Ohio’s new OLN Center for Excellence in E-Learning, which will be supervised by Dr. Bruce Edwards, associate vice president for academic technology and e-learning, and Connie Molnar, director of the Center for Online and Blended Learning (COBL).

Sheryl Hansen, the OBOR staff member who announced the center’s creation, said “the Center for Online and Blended Learning at BGSU has knowledge, proven capacity and a rich history in supporting quality e-learning.”

As a result, Hansen added, campuses statewide can benefit from COBL’s established excellence in providing “support, training and ongoing professional development” that meet the criteria of national best practices and quality standards.

The OLN center will be launched next spring with the help of $80,000 in state funds for local staffing for BGSU, and for small grants to support pilot projects in quality assurance in online education across the state.

Albert Colom, vice president for enrollment management, agreed that the distinction BGSU has received is well warranted. “The state’s recognition of the achievements of Academic Technology and COBL testifies not only to the quality of our online programs, but also to the quality of the leadership of our staff,” he said.

Edwards, who has been leading BGSU’s distance education efforts since 2001, noted that “talented and dedicated faculty collaborating with skilled instructional designers make the difference in delivering quality coursework and maintaining student-centered support services.”

The center, said Molnar, “will benefit BGSU by drawing even more attention to the quality and diversity of its online programs, and giving our faculty the recognition they deserve for innovative instruction that maintains the integrity and rigor of their curricula.”

BGSU is fully accredited by the Higher Learning Commission and the North Central Association to offer any of its degrees online. And Edwards and Molnar are both involved in OBOR Chancellor Eric Fingerhut’s strategic planning group that is creating a 10-year plan for expanding access to Ohio’s degree programs through online delivery.

“This is an auspicious time for BGSU to take on the leadership of this new center, and we look forward to the challenge and benefits of working with colleagues across the state in advancing Ohio’s reputation for innovation and quality in online education,” Edwards added.

4 responses so far

Oct 13 2009


Quality Matters training and reflection

I am blogging during a break at BGSU’s Quality Matters training session, and allows me to say QM is a great tool for both evaluating and generating good online course design. In point of fact, QM’s rubrics provide valuable insight into creating any kind of online-F2F course work that is effective for a student-centered learning environment that happens to deploy online/Web 2.0 tools. We recommend that any and all BGSU faculty involved in course design eventually receive this training.

A few other observations:

  • This is the first time I have heard the term “Big box universities” before. Ponder the term, and let me know what you think the connotations are.
  • Seeing up close and personal another teacher’s syllabus, no matter how extensive and information-ful it may be, gives one pause, forcing one to ask, “is that how I sound to my student”? And thus proves the value of peer-assessment.
  • Eventually, the SME role (subject matter expert) would become crucial should one aspire to be a certified QM reviewer. Once you step of broadly conceived best practices in course design, how do you adequately critique the intra-course learning outcomes effectively without knowledge of the field?
  • A majority of faculty in postsecondary institutions have had little or no training in actual teaching or course design. As SME they are expected to “delivery” expertise. QM helps us see that that is a very one-dimensional viewpoint, and decidedly un-learner-centric.
  • One response so far